There are so many charities and most all of them are asking for a donation from you. Each of these organization advocate
for different causes and the people working or asking are doing so because in
the belief or connection to the cause. When you donate to a charity you
probably do so because you believe in what they are doing, or you want to help
a specific cause or have a connection to it. While most Americans are very
generous to charities, many don’t and that is their complete right. Each of us
work hard for our money, each of us have our own fair share of “life”
happening. How and where people spend their money is their prerogative.
Heart
disease is America's number one killer and a major cause of permanent
disability. Congenital Heart Defects are the number one birth defect, number one in birth defect related deaths. Thousands of children born with CHDs will not see their first birth
The Federal Government spends approximately 35 Billion
Dollars or about 2% of the budget on on healthcare research; naturally this too
is extremely political when it comes to the allocation of research funds. The politics
of illness are complex, yet so are diseases. Certain diseases have large
communities of support, with celebrity spokespeople and funding to match. Of
course, it is understandable that some illnesses would attract more advocacy
and research dollars (which come from both public and private resources). But mortality rates of illness don't quite
match up with the amount of money spent on people with specific illnesses.
Reports have suggested that research dollars are allocated when a member of
Congress advocates for funding of a disease. Many times driven by a family
member or close friend being stricken be engages member of Congress and in turn
a powerful emotional pull has weight in the determination of funding. Not to mention the public private partnership
sectors through foundations and universities assisting in guiding the monies
and how they are spent on research. Additionally and in general, diseases and defects in children get
proportionally less emphasis than adult diseases. The
problem with low funding rates for a particular research area is not only that
useful research opportunities are missed but that the low probability of funding
success drives promising scientists into other research areas. Unfortunately there is no national
organization devoted to specifically to CHD pediatric research nor are
there any federally-funded national health education or research programs targeting
outcomes, needs, or genetics in adult congenital heart defect survivors and
their offspring, therefore individual efforts consistently
provide considerable help in keeping this field of research going.

No comments:
Post a Comment